Yeasts diversity of inoculated and spontaneous fermentations
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] To explore the effects of spontaneous and inoculated wine fermentations on the yeast diversity and genetic diversity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. [Methods] Spontaneous and inoculated fermentations were conducted with Chardonnay using different S. cerevisiae strains of NXU17-26, UCD522 and UCD2610. We used 26S rDNA D1/D2 sequence analysis and Interdelta fingerprint to distinguish the yeasts at interspecific and intraspecific levels, respectively. The diversity of S. cerevisiae strains was analysed by cluster analysis and diversity index. [Results] The fermentation curve of spontaneous fermentation was relatively smooth, and the fermentation speed of inoculated fermentations was significantly faster than spontaneous fermentation. The isolated yeasts were identified as 6 genera and 11 species with 6 species of 5 genera of non-Saccharomyces in spontaneous fermentation. The yeast diversity in inoculated fermentation was far lower than that in spontaneous fermentation, which was composed of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and two non-Saccharomyces. UCD2610 dominated the corresponding fermentation and its genotype accounted for 48.78%; while in the fermentation inoculated with NXU17-26 and UCD522, we didn't find the same genotype as them. Genetic differences between Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from UCD522 fermentation were small, while obvious in NXU17-26 and UCD2610 fermentations. Diversity index results showed that UCD2610 showed a more prominent position in the fermentation; Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated in UCD522 fermentation showed a higher diversity, and there were more unknown factors affecting the population diversity and the concentration of different genotypes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. [Conclusion] Fermentation methods have a significant effect on the yeast diversity and the genetic diversity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. This study provides reference for the control of microorganisms during wine fermentation.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Rongrong He, Jing Peng, Yue Sun. Yeasts diversity of inoculated and spontaneous fermentations. [J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2021, 61(5): 1211-1221

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:May 10,2020
  • Revised:July 01,2020
  • Adopted:
  • Online: May 07,2021
  • Published:
Article QR Code